Skip to main content

Q&A: The macroeconomic outlook for fixed income

Liam O’Donnell leads the Artemis fixed income team’s strategy on macro and rates. Here, he provides his thoughts on the current economic backdrop and the implications for the fixed income market.

1. Is the market being too optimistic about the prospect for rates to be cut in 2024? Could rates stay higher for longer?

In my view, the market may be underestimating two tail risks. One is that rates stay ‘higher for longer’. But I believe the market may also be being too optimistic in believing that global central banks will achieve a soft landing. There must be a possibility that economies have yet to see the true impact of the most aggressive rate-tightening cycle in decades.

So, while we must acknowledge that market pricing is just a probability-weighted set of outcomes, the consensus view it implies – that a ‘soft landing’ has been achieved – may be too optimistic.

Remember that, after a long period of zero interest rates, we’ve just had an interest-rate shock that saw the Fed pushing rates up by more than 5% in less than two years1. If growth does deteriorate, rates may need to be cut more aggressively than the market expects.

“Economies have yet to feel the full impact of the most aggressive rate-tightening cycle in decades…”

Fed rate cumulative change since cycle start

line graph showing fed fund rate cumulative change since cycle start

Source: Bloomberg as at 4 March 2024. Market expectations are shown by a dashed line

2.Is the final mile of bringing inflation down going to be the hardest and what could that look like?

Headline measures of inflation have fallen rapidly. They could be back below central-bank targets by the middle of 2024 in the UK, EU and the US.

Admittedly, core inflation has been falling more slowly and services inflation has been sticky. I might be concerned if central banks weren’t focusing on these stickier measures of inflation – but they are.

Forward-looking survey measures of pricing pressures, meanwhile, suggest the downward trend in inflation is set to continue. So, while the final mile of bringing inflation down might take longer than some expect, I don’t think a slow glide path that brings it gradually back towards target is necessarily a bad thing. 

3. Where do your views diverge most from consensus?

I see potential for growth in the UK to surprise on the upside. The UK is in a fiscally weak position – but the UK’s consumers look relatively resilient. They have faced a tighter squeeze on disposable incomes than their US counterparts over the past two years but the real income differential has now swung significantly in favour of UK households. Inflation in the UK is falling rapidly even as wage growth, although slowing, is still tracking at around 6%. So workers should feel a boost to their ‘real’ incomes this year.  

“One reason why UK economic growth be stronger than expected: consumers are seeing a boost to their ‘real’ incomes as wage growth beats inflation…”

Real wage growth (%change on YoY)

line graph showing real wages have turned positive

Source: Lazarus Economics & Strategy/ONS as at 31 March 2024

4. Do you still expect yield curves to steepen? If so, why?

Yes. On a multi-year view, yield curves will steepen – it’s just a question of by how much.

If we look at the two-year versus 10-year area of the curve, it is inverted across the US, EU and UK. We are heading into a rate-cutting cycle. Bond supplies, meanwhile, have never been higher in net terms and will remain elevated over the years to come.

I don’t, however, believe it is necessarily a good idea to let steepening strategies dominate a bond portfolio’s risk profile – especially as most expressions of a steeper curve impose a heavily negative cost of carry. I think a steeper yield curve has become such a consensus view that the risk/reward in steepening strategies is not compelling. 

Should the curve be this flat in a world without QE?

Line graph showing UK government bond curve

Source: Bloomberg as at 28 February 2024

5. Which parts of the yield curve offer the best balance between risk and reward?

That’s easy. In my view, shorter-dated bonds offer a compelling balance between risk and reward. Ultimately, I believe that interest-rate cuts will dominate and that yields will move lower across the yield curve once the cutting cycle begins.

Shorter-dated bonds, meanwhile, are not influenced to the same extent as longer-dated bonds by the structural shift away from quantitative easing towards quantitative tightening.

On top of this, the supply of bonds has increased markedly from the pre-Covid levels. This should act as a headwind to longer-dated bonds relative to their short-dated counterparts. While longer-dated bonds have greater potential to deliver superior returns under a hard-landing scenario, the balance between risk and reward very much favours the short end of the curve.

1Source: Effective Federal Funds Rate - FEDERAL RESERVE BANK of NEW YORK (newyorkfed.org)

Investment in a fund concerns the acquisition of units/shares in the fund and not in the underlying assets of the fund.

Reference to specific shares or companies should not be taken as advice or a recommendation to invest in them.

For information on sustainability-related aspects of a fund, visit the relevant fund page on this website.

For information about Artemis’ fund structures and registration status, visit artemisfunds.com/fund-structures

Any research and analysis in this communication has been obtained by Artemis for its own use. Although this communication is based on sources of information that Artemis believes to be reliable, no guarantee is given as to its accuracy or completeness.

Any forward-looking statements are based on Artemis’ current expectations and projections and are subject to change without notice.

Third parties (including FTSE and Morningstar) whose data may be included in this document do not accept any liability for errors or omissions. For information, visit artemisfunds.com/third-party-data.

Important information
The intention of Artemis’ ‘investment insights’ articles is to present objective news, information, data and guidance on finance topics drawn from a diverse collection of sources. Content is not intended to provide tax, legal, insurance or investment advice and should not be construed as an offer to sell, a solicitation of an offer to buy, or a recommendation for any security or investment by Artemis or any third-party. Potential investors should consider the need for independent financial advice. Any research or analysis has been procured by Artemis for its own use and may be acted on in that connection. The contents of articles are based on sources of information believed to be reliable; however, save to the extent required by applicable law or regulations, no guarantee, warranty or representation is given as to its accuracy or completeness. Any forward-looking statements are based on Artemis’ current opinions, expectations and projections. Articles are provided to you only incidentally, and any opinions expressed are subject to change without notice. The source for all data is Artemis, unless stated otherwise. The value of an investment, and any income from it, can fall as well as rise as a result of market and currency fluctuations and you may not get back the amount originally invested.