Skip to main content

Are leading brands about to have their Taylor Swift moment?

The star’s fans are expected to generate $5 billion in consumer spending across the duration of her Eras tour. But this impact is likely to be dwarfed by a return to pre-pandemic travel trends among a more highly valued demographic.

For centuries, the return of the common swift to the UK in mid- to late-spring has heralded the approach of brighter days to come. Over the past couple of years, the migratory pattern of a different type of Swift has had a similar effect on the mood of business owners across the US.

The biggest star in the world today, Taylor Swift grossed $1.04bn from her Eras tour alone last year, selling 4.35 million tickets across 60 dates1.

This is big business, and not just for Swift and her entourage. Data from Navan shows the average price of a hotel room on the night of tour show was 50.28% higher ($99 on average) than the equivalent day the following week.

‘Swiftonomics’

The wider influence of ‘Swiftonomics’ is expected to generate $5 billion in consumer spending2 across the US for the duration of the Eras tour, including on new outfits, travel and restaurant bookings.

As owners of US hotel brands such as Hilton and Marriott in our portfolio, what do we as fund managers take from these figures?

Not much. Aside from the fact these are global businesses, any boost to US earnings will be limited and short term in nature, so will not affect our long-term investment views on the stocks.

It might be different if, rather than a single star and her fans, an affluent subset of the world’s second most populous country decided to descend on a certain region en masse this year, but is this likely to happen? Surprisingly, we think the answer could well be ‘yes’.

The return of the Chinese tourist

Pandemic-related lockdowns in China had implications far beyond the country’s borders and it wasn’t until the final quarter of last year that outbound tourism finally exceeded 2019 levels3.

But despite significant excess savings accumulated during Covid, most Chinese nationals prioritised travel to nearby Asian destinations over Europe. In Q1 2023 for example, outbound travel to France and Italy had recovered to just 6 and 5% of pre-pandemic levels respectively4.

By Q3, these figures had risen to 39 and 23%5 – a significant improvement, but still well below where they were in 2019.

Why is the recovery of this demographic important? China was the world’s largest outbound tourism market in 2019, accounting for $255 billion, or 20%, of total spending6. Prior to the pandemic, more than half of spending by Chinese consumers on brands took place outside their home market7.

Fortunately, there are signs that things could soon return to normal. Data from Global Blue suggests in-store tax-free shopping globally reached 141% of January 2019 levels in the equivalent month this year. In continental Europe, it reached 132%.

This was fuelled by a rebound in spending from Chinese tourists, at 71% of 2019 levels in February, up from 58% in Q4 20238. Not there yet, but definitely moving in the right direction.

Polarisation

This could lead to a much-needed boost for the consumer brands sector, but we would warn against counting on a uniform rebound. The past few years have seen a growing polarisation between ‘leading’ and ‘lagging’ brands, with the former extending their advantage over the latter.

This was notable in luxury goods towards the end of 2023 when companies such as Hermès9 and LVMH (Louis Vuitton Moët Hennessy) beat sales forecasts10 despite the ongoing slowdown across the sector following two years of giddy ‘revenge spending’.

Of course, it is easy to highlight the winners with the benefit of hindsight, but the roots of their outperformance become apparent if you look at their long-term strategy.

Among the criteria we use to define leading brands is that they continue to invest during times of economic hardship and in this regard, both Hermès and LVMH stood out from the rest of the luxury goods sector during the pandemic.

As the world locked down and Hermès’ peers went into survival mode and cut costs, it insisted on retaining every employee on full pay without resorting to government assistance. This is despite the fact it makes 90% of its sales in its stores, which were shut for the best part of six months11.

Meanwhile, LVMH significantly extended its digital capabilities in distribution and marketing and in January 2021 finally completed its acquisition of jewellery brand Tiffany & Co. for $16.2 billion12.

A head-start over competitors

Such long-term thinking allowed these companies to win a disproportionate amount of market share in the subsequent rebound and strengthened their brand power against their peers.

It is a pattern they have demonstrated again and again, through crisis after crisis ever since they were launched, in 1837 for Hermès, and 1854, 1743 and 1765 for Louis Vuitton, Moët & Chandon and Hennessy.

Think less Taylor Swift, who will likely be usurped by The Next Big Thing within a matter of years, and more the common swift, whose patterns of behaviour – and their promise of brighter days to come – have been established over a matter of centuries.

Investment in a fund concerns the acquisition of units/shares in the fund and not in the underlying assets of the fund.

Reference to specific shares or companies should not be taken as advice or a recommendation to invest in them.

For information on sustainability-related aspects of a fund, visit the relevant fund page on this website.

For information about Artemis’ fund structures and registration status, visit artemisfunds.com/fund-structures

Any research and analysis in this communication has been obtained by Artemis for its own use. Although this communication is based on sources of information that Artemis believes to be reliable, no guarantee is given as to its accuracy or completeness.

Any forward-looking statements are based on Artemis’ current expectations and projections and are subject to change without notice.

Third parties (including FTSE and Morningstar) whose data may be included in this document do not accept any liability for errors or omissions. For information, visit artemisfunds.com/third-party-data.

Important information
The intention of Artemis’ ‘investment insights’ articles is to present objective news, information, data and guidance on finance topics drawn from a diverse collection of sources. Content is not intended to provide tax, legal, insurance or investment advice and should not be construed as an offer to sell, a solicitation of an offer to buy, or a recommendation for any security or investment by Artemis or any third-party. Potential investors should consider the need for independent financial advice. Any research or analysis has been procured by Artemis for its own use and may be acted on in that connection. The contents of articles are based on sources of information believed to be reliable; however, save to the extent required by applicable law or regulations, no guarantee, warranty or representation is given as to its accuracy or completeness. Any forward-looking statements are based on Artemis’ current opinions, expectations and projections. Articles are provided to you only incidentally, and any opinions expressed are subject to change without notice. The source for all data is Artemis, unless stated otherwise. The value of an investment, and any income from it, can fall as well as rise as a result of market and currency fluctuations and you may not get back the amount originally invested.